Mobility Radeon X2300 vs Radeon R5 A240
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R5 A240 Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.272GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jan 2014
M6x
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
392 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
64MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.272GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.916 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
1.916 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
M64
GPU Name
Jet
M64-M
(216PVAVA12FG)
(216PVAVA12FG)
GPU Variant
Jet XT
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
