Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.44GB/s)
2672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
520
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +2275%
12350

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
Manhattan
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
795 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.44GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
400
Shading Units
3072
20
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Madison
GPU Name
AD107
Madison XT


(216-0772003)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net