MediaTek Helio G36 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2200MHz MediaTek Helio G36 vs. 8 cores 2285MHz HiSilicon Kirin 8020 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (1.7203 TFLOPS vs 0.0435 TFLOPS )
Larger memory bandwidth (68.2GB/s vs 13.9GB/s)
Higher Frequency (2285MHz vs 2200MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 12nm)
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
MediaTek Helio G36
154460
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
+527%
968920
FP32 (float)
MediaTek Helio G36
43
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
+3900%
1720
CPU
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
1x 2.285 GHz –
3x 2.05 GHz –
4x 1.3 GHz –
3x 2.05 GHz –
4x 1.3 GHz –
2200 MHz
Frequency
2285 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
12 nm
Process
7 nm
2.2 W
TDP
-
TSMC
Manufacturing
SMIC
Graphics
PowerVR GE8320
GPU name
Maleoon 920
680 MHz
GPU frequency
840 MHz
4
Execution units
-
8
Shading units
512
8
Max size
16
0.0435 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.7203 TFLOPS
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
1.2
OpenCL version
2.0
-
DirectX version
12
Memory
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
1600 MHz
Memory frequency
4266 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
13.9 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
68.2 Gbit/s
Multimedia (ISP)
No
Neural processor (NPU)
Da Vinci
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
2400 x 1080
Max display resolution
-
1x 50MP, 2x 13MP
Max camera resolution
-
1K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS
1080p at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
-
No
5G support
Yes
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
-
Up to 150 Mbps
Upload speed
-
5
Wi-Fi
7
5.0
Bluetooth
5.4
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
