Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1650MHz vs 1455MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2534
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+252%
8940
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Mar 2023
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
96
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
AD107
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
