Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs P106M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1650MHz vs 1291MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
P106M Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2534
P106M
+17%
2974
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jan 2019
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
9
768
Shading Units
1152
48
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.4 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
