Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs FirePro W5170M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1650MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
128 additional rendering cores
FirePro W5170M Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+114%
2534
FirePro W5170M
1184
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
HD Graphics-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Tropo
-
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
