Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs GMA X3500
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G4 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
384 additional rendering cores
GMA X3500 Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Score
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Aug 2007
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
8
12
ROPs
1
0 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
13.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
667.0 MPixel/s
26.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.336 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
13W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake (G35)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Generation 4.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
90 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
