Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Radeon 3000 IGP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 3000 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1400MHz
728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+7578%
2150
Radeon 3000 IGP
28
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
HD Graphics-M
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.400 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.400 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.00 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
Graphics Processor
Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
RS780
-
GPU Variant
RS780L
Generation 12.2
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.18 billion
Unknown
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
