Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs UHD Graphics 630
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Advantages
200 additional rendering cores
UHD Graphics 630 Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1150MHz vs 800MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
+45%
614
UHD Graphics 630
423
Graphics Card
Sep 2014
Release Date
Apr 2020
HD Graphics-W
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
800 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
384
Shading Units
184
48
TMUs
23
6
ROPs
3
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.450 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.45 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
846.4 GFLOPS
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
423.2 GFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Broadwell GT3e
GPU Name
Comet Lake GT2
Generation 8.0
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
