Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Vega 11 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1301MHz vs 1100MHz)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
845
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
+116%
1832
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
556
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
+106%
1149
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
283
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
+102%
572
Graphics Card
Sep 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Great Horned Owl
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1301 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
11
384
Shading Units
704
48
TMUs
44
6
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.41 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.664 TFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.832 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Broadwell GT3e
GPU Name
Raven
Generation 8.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.94 billion
Unknown
Die Size
210 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.0
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4