Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GMA 3100
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
384 additional rendering cores
GMA 3100 Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
May 2007
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
384
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
6
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
13W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake-G+ (G33)
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 4.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm++
Process Size
90 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
