Intel Xeon Phi 7250 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7250 with 68 cores 1.4GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 with 8 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 1.4GHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 215W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2016
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
8 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
215 W
Power Consumption
55 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
-
Die Size
213 mm²
CPU Performance
1.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
68
Total Core Count
8
272
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
14.0
Multiplier
25.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
-
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
32
