Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3 vs Centaur CHA
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3 with 10 cores 1.9GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3 Advantages
Released 114 years and 5 months late
Higher base frequency (1.9GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (25MB vs 16MB)
Centaur CHA Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 1866)
More modern manufacturing process (16nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (70W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3
349
Centaur CHA
+125%
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3
3792
Centaur CHA
+5%
3982
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3
482
Centaur CHA
+5%
508
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3
+388%
16499
Centaur CHA
3379
General Parameters
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 1901
Intel
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Haswell-EX
Core Architecture
CHA
Intel Socket 2011-1
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E7 (Haswell-EX)
Generation
CHA (CNS)
Package
5.96 billions
Transistor Count
-
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
115 W
Power Consumption
70 W
70 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
622 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
CPU Performance
1.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
10
Total Core Count
8
20
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
19.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
25 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
4
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4-1866
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
4
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
32
PCIe Lanes
44
