Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3 with 6 cores 3.5GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3 Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 1.5GHz)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 15MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3
+3%
819
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
789
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3
+174%
5726
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
General Parameters
Sep 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Haswell-EP
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 2011-3
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
2.6 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
140 W
Power Consumption
30 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
356 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²
CPU Performance
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
6
Total Core Count
8
12
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
15 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR4-2133
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
40
PCIe Lanes
32
