Intel Core i3 N300 vs Intel Processor N200
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core i3 N300 with 8 cores 0.8GHz and Intel Processor N200 with 4 cores 1.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Processor N200 Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4800)
Lower TDP (6W vs 7W)
Score
Benchmark
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i3 N300
513
Intel Processor N200
+80%
924
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i3 N300
2545
Intel Processor N200
+17%
2988
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i3 N300
1189
Intel Processor N200
+6%
1262
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i3 N300
+19%
3217
Intel Processor N200
2701
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i3 N300
2098
Intel Processor N200
+1%
2120
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i3 N300
+49%
8469
Intel Processor N200
5669
General Parameters
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Alder Lake
i3-N300
Processor Number
N200
BGA-1264
Socket
BGA-1264
UHD Graphics (32EU)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics (32 EU)
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
7 W
Power Consumption
6 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105°C
CPU Performance
8
Efficiency Cores
4
8
Efficiency Core Threads
4
0.8 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.0 GHz
3.8 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
8
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
8
Multiplier
10
96 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
2 MB shared
L2 Cache
2 MB shared
6 MB shared
L3 Cache
6 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800,DDR4-3200,LPDDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-4800
16 GB
Max Memory Size
16 GB
1
Max Memory Channels
1
38.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
38.4 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
1250 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
750 MHz
256
Shader Units
256
16
Texture Units
16
8
Raster Operation Units
8
32
Execution Units
32
15
Power Consumption
45 W
0.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.74 TFLOPS
