Intel Core i3 1125G4 vs Intel Core i7 8559U
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core i3 1125G4 with 4 cores 0.9GHz and Intel Core i7 8559U with 4 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i3 1125G4 Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (3733 vs 2400)
Larger memory bandwidth (51.2GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Intel Core i7 8559U Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.0GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i3 1125G4
+7%
1517
Intel Core i7 8559U
1416
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i3 1125G4
4393
Intel Core i7 8559U
+10%
4869
Blender
Intel Core i3 1125G4
48
Intel Core i7 8559U
+43%
69
General Parameters
Sep 2020
Release Date
Apr 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Tiger Lake UP4
Core Architecture
Kaby Lake-R
i3-1125G4
Processor Number
-
BGA-1449
Socket
Intel BGA 1356
UHD Graphics Xe G4
Integrated Graphics
Iris Pro Plus
-
Generation
Core i7 (Kaby Lake-U Refresh)
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
12-28 W
Power Consumption
28 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
72 °C
-
Foundry
Intel
-
Die Size
123 mm²
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
-
8
Performance Core Threads
-
0.9-2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
4
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
9-20x
Multiplier
27.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1280 K per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733
Memory Types
DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133
64 GB
Max Memory Size
32 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
51.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
37.5 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
1250 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1200 MHz
384
Shader Units
-
24
Texture Units
-
12
Raster Operation Units
-
48
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
