Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce RTX 5090 vs GeForce GTX 285

GeForce RTX 5090 vs GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 5090 Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2407MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
21520 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 285 Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 575W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 5090 +14702%
104800
GeForce GTX 285
708

Graphics Card

Jan 2025
Release Date
Dec 2008
GeForce 50
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2017 MHz
Base Clock
-
2407 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR7
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1.79TB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

170
SM Count
30
21760
Shading Units
240
680
TMUs
80
176
ROPs
32
680
Tensor Cores
-
170
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

423.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
1637 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
104.8 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
104.8 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
1.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

575W
TDP
204W
950 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GB202
GPU Name
GT200B
GB202-300-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
92.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
750 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
12.0
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net