GeForce RTX 5090 vs GeForce 205 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 5090 Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2407MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
21744 additional rendering cores
GeForce 205 OEM Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 575W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 5090
+232788%
104800
GeForce 205 OEM
45
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Nov 2009
GeForce 50
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2017 MHz
Base Clock
-
2407 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR7
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.79TB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
170
SM Count
2
21760
Shading Units
16
680
TMUs
8
176
ROPs
4
680
Tensor Cores
-
170
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
423.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
1637 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
104.8 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
104.8 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
1.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
575W
TDP
31W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GB202
GPU Name
GT218
GB202-300-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
92.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
750 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
12.0
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
