GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti Advantages
Boost Clock2565MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
18128 additional rendering cores
NVS 310 Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
+93140%
93240
NVS 310
100
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2325 MHz
Base Clock
-
2565 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
142
SM Count
1
18176
Shading Units
48
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
492.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
1457 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
93.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
93.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
1457 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
20W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF119
AD102-400-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
