GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs GeForce GT 325M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 325M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
9680 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 325M Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
+34615%
32980
GeForce GT 325M
95
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1335 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
76
SM Count
6
9728
Shading Units
48
304
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
189.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
515.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
32.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.98 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
95.04 GFLOPS
515.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
23W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GT216
GN21-X11
GPU Variant
N11P-GV1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
