GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro FX 4000 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Advantages
Released 19 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
8448 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 4000 SDI Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 285W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2024
Release Date
Apr 2004
GeForce 40
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.3GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
66
SM Count
-
8448
Shading Units
-
264
TMUs
12
96
ROPs
8
264
Tensor Cores
-
66
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
250.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
44.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
689.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
285W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x SDI
4x SDI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
NV41
AD103-275-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
