GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs GeForce 8800 GTS 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
8320 additional rendering cores
GeForce 8800 GTS 512 Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 285W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
+10500%
44100
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
416
Graphics Card
Jan 2024
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.3GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s
Render Config
66
SM Count
16
8448
Shading Units
128
264
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
264
Tensor Cores
-
66
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
250.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
44.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
689.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
285W
TDP
135W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
G92
AD103-275-A1
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
