GeForce RTX 4060 vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (272.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3032 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060
+47118%
15110
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1830 MHz
Base Clock
-
2460 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2125 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
272.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
40
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
118.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
236.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
15.11 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.11 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
236.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
115W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV620
AD107-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
(215-0670006)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
