GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q vs Radeon Pro W6600M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 90W)
Radeon Pro W6600M Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2034MHz vs 1605MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q
+12%
8218
Radeon Pro W6600M
7290
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1224 MHz
1605 MHz
Boost Clock
2034 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
20
SM Count
66
2560
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
264
20
RT Cores
28
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
77.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.2 GPixel/s
128.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
227.8 GTexel/s
8.218 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.58 TFLOPS
8.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.290 TFLOPS
128.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Navi 23
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
Navi 23 WKS-XM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7