GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2400 PCI Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 70W)
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
-
72
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV380
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Rage 9
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
130 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-
