GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1477MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 95W)
Radeon E9550 MXM Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+3%
6050
Radeon E9550 MXM
5834
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1185 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
95W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
