GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs GeForce GT 240M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 240M Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+5115%
6050
GeForce GT 240M
116
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
6
2048
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
23W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GS
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
