Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce MX330 vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

GeForce MX330 vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce MX330 Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1594MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX330 +46%
1224
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
833

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1531 MHz
Base Clock
-
1594 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.680 GPixel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
19.13 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1224 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
833.3 GFLOPS
38.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
GK107
GP108-655-A1


(N17S-G3-A1)
GPU Variant
GT 755M
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net