GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX150 Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 122W)
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1177
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
+87%
2209
Graphics Card
May 2017
Release Date
Oct 2012
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.01 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.03 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.209 TFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.03 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
122W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
GK104
GP108-650-A1
(N17S-G1-A1)
(N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX2-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
