GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs GeForce RTX 4080
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 320W)
GeForce RTX 4080 Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 170% (2505MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
6848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5345
GeForce RTX 4080
+811%
48740
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2022
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
2205 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
76
2880
Shading Units
9728
240
TMUs
304
48
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
320W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
AD103
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
