Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (1725MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample +21%
5345
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

875 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
2880
Shading Units
1280
240
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK180
GPU Name
TU116
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net