GeForce GTX 675M vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 675M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 675M
952
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1197%
12350
Graphics Card
Mar 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
39.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
79.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
AD107
N13E-GS1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
