GeForce GTX 285 vs Radeon RX 6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 285 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Radeon RX 6300 Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
708
Radeon RX 6300
+342%
3133
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
32bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 24
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7