GeForce GTX 285 vs H100 SXM5 94 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 94GB VRAM H100 SXM5 94 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 285 Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 700W)
H100 SXM5 94 GB Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1980MHz
More VRAM (94GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3.36TB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
16656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
708
H100 SXM5 94 GB
+9350%
66910
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
94GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
512bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3.36TB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
132
240
Shading Units
16896
80
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
700W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GH100
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
80 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
9.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
