GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 480
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 285 Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX 480 Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
708
GeForce GTX 480
+89%
1345
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Mar 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
15
240
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
60
32
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.03 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.06 GTexel/s
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1345 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
168.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF100
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
GF100-375-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
