GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 93% (1785MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+165%
5027
Radeon R7 265
1894
Graphics Card
Oct 2019
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
1024
88
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
(215-0828062)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1