GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN Z to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (1785MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 375W)
GeForce GTX TITAN Z Advantages
1472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
5027
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
5046
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+140%
6048
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2510
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+103%
2792
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
1371
Graphics Card
Oct 2019
Release Date
May 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
705 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
2880
88
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GK110B
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-350-B1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
