GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+708%
5027
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
622
Graphics Card
Oct 2019
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
30
1408
Shading Units
240
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
219W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G92B
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
