GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 380X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)
Radeon R9 380X Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
Radeon R9 380X
+33%
3973
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
+18%
3566
Radeon R9 380X
3011
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650
+24%
1606
Radeon R9 380X
1294
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1425 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
182.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.04 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.2 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.973 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.973 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
248.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Antigua
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Antigua XT
(215-0877016)
(215-0877016)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3