GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 285W)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (2610MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+1377%
44100
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2024
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
66
896
Shading Units
8448
56
TMUs
264
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
285W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
AD102
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
