GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTS 240 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+722%
2984
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
363
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jul 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
14
896
Shading Units
112
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G92B
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
