GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro W4300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
FirePro W4300 Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+108%
2984
FirePro W4300
1428
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Bonaire
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3