GeForce GTX 1050 vs FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1050 Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050
+142%
1862
FirePro V4900
768
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1354 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
58.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
29.10 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.862 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
58.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
Turks
GP107-300-A1
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0