GeForce GTX 1050 vs FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1050 Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1354 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
58.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
29.10 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.862 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
58.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
RV516
GP107-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
R500
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
