GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GT 340 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1392MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 340 OEM Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
+731%
2138
GeForce GT 340 OEM
257
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1392 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
12
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
44.54 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
66.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
33.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.138 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
66.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GT215
GP107-400-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
