Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2010MHz vs 1442MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 84.10GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
2215
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+457%
12350
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 10 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1366 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
96
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
34.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
69.22 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
34.61 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
2.215 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
69.22 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
AD107
N17P-G0-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
