GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon RX 9070 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTS 250 Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 304W)
Radeon RX 9070 XT Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2970MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
387
Radeon RX 9070 XT
+12473%
48660
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTS 250
1094
Radeon RX 9070 XT
+2682%
30445
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2025
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1660 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2970 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
380.2 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
760.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
97.32 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.521 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
304W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Navi 48
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
(215-176600315)
(215-176600315)
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8