GeForce GTS 250 vs GeForce GTX 780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTS 250 Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX 780 Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
387
GeForce GTX 780
+973%
4156
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTS 250
1094
GeForce GTX 780
+155%
2790
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
GK110
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
GK110-300-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
