GeForce G105M vs RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce G105M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce G105M Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 35W)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce G105M
34
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+26194%
8940
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 100M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
24
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
34.24 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
AD107
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
