Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce 940MX vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

GeForce 940MX vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 940MX and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce 940MX Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 150W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1680MHz vs 1242MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 940MX
954
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 +3326%
32690

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1004 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1242 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
24
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.936 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
29.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
953.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
29.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
150W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
AD103
N16S-GTR-S
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
45.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net